Protection from who and what?

WOAW’s Proposal…

is in line with Wellesley's values and policies and proposes that the College shall maintain a work environment free from discrimination and harassment.

The College’s Proposal…

only protects employees from discrimination by the College—by which they mean high ranking officials. Harassment and discrimination from other members of the community, or people who may harass an employee who are not part of the Wellesley community, is not covered

Protected Categories

WOAW’s Proposal…

proposes that the College shall not discriminate against employees on account of citizenship and immigration status, health condition, political activity, caste, and more.

The College’s Proposal…

proposed removing citizenship and immigration status, health condition, political activity, and caste from protected categories.

Recourse

WOAW’s Proposal

Employees who face harassment and/or discrimination may choose to file a grievance (the standard way contracts are enforced). The employee will work with the Union (one of your colleagues!) to draft remedies. The remedies we can request in the grievance process are supportive measures—non-punitive measures designed to restore or preserve an employee's ability to work and participate in the Wellesley community. After filing a grievance, a meeting will take place between the employee (and Union) and the College on a set timeline (we propose within five business days), and a response is due back from the College on a set timeline (we propose within 5 business days). As is true in all grievance cases, the College can choose to implement the remedies or to deny the grievance and remedies. If the College chooses to deny the grievance and remedies, the employee can appeal the grievance forward again to the College. If the grievance is denied by the College again, the Union can appeal the grievance to a neutral third-party (arbitration). WOAW’s proposal does not prohibit or exclude workers from also choosing to work with the Colleges’ internal processes and investigations, should they elect to do so.

The College’s Proposal

In their proposal on 10/22, the College proposed that workers are allowed to file a grievance on discrimination and harassment that occurs based on protected category and only from official acting on behalf of the College. However, the College also proposed that the grievance be “held in abeyance” (or paused) while the complaint is processed through the College’s internal policies. Only after the internal processes are complete OR after 120 days may the grievance re-activated. Any discrimination or harassment that is not “by the College” cannot be remedied in the College’s proposal. In the College’s proposal, requests for supportive measures are determined solely by the College and may be denied. Such a policy would allow an employee to work without necessary support for four months.